Whats goes on everyday, Stardock Forums, life, and all
Published on April 19, 2009 By GeneralEtrius In Everything Else

This is my opinion of Stardock new GOO DRM.

Don't do it. Just don't do it.

Remember what people say. DRM, no matter how light or minimal, is still DRM. Judging by what I've read, GOO does things with the internet, as does other DRM, and it makes itself a center component of a game installation, as does other DRM again.

I know Stardock means well with this, but many people know Stardock for a "No DRM" stance, so they'll probably feel cheated and turn to piracy, which will make publishers turn to invasive DRM, which will make even more people turn to piracy, and the cycle continues. In fact, the anti-DRM site Reclaim Your Game dropped Stardock from their trusted list because of this, and I think something about Impulse.

Come on Stardock. Please dont do this to us. Reputation takes years to make, seconds to break.

Instead of this GOO, just dont do anything with copy protection or DRM. It just doesnt work. A reason Sins of a Solar Empire sold well is not only because it was an excellent game, but had zero DRM, save a serial number used to register the game and download updates, which really doesn't count.

I'm sorry to those who think I'm ranting or trolling, it's not my intention.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 19, 2009

MottiKhan

because i made a posted telling all of you pirates you are dumb i can't come up with my own ideas?
No, I said that because you're a coward and the true troll.

You spout bullshit that you have no first clue about in the hopes that you'll gain a following.  Not gonna happen, troll.

 

 

calling people trolls is real good defense. how bout you tell me why goo is bad? cause you cant play the game online when you illegally dl it?

on Apr 19, 2009

piderman

Quoting psychoak, reply 13Considering the actual pirates that crack and post the games don't bother with DRM free games
And you know the most ironic thing? Those actual pirates have to actually buy the game before they can crack it

 

yup, tell that to the demigod people, 5 to 1 pirate to gamer  ratio earlier

 

you drm enemies have no facts straight

 

LOLOLOL

on Apr 19, 2009

psychoak
Considering the actual pirates that crack and post the games don't bother with DRM free games, the idea that someone is a pirate or pirate sympathizer for being against DRM is... stupid?  As far as I can tell, they enjoy the challenge and race each other to crack the new game first.  If there isn't anything to crack, and there isn't on any of them yet, what's the point?

Tell me, of the millions of pirated copies of Spore that exist, how many people actually cracked the game themselves? Twenty, maybe thirty? The rest just rode the other people's effort, just like they rode the game developer's effort. There's a huge difference between the guy who cracks it and the horde that use that crack. The cracker may not be interested in a DRM-free game, but the horde of users are. They get the game without having to wait for it to be cracked.

Not to mention the other stuff being tossed about. No registration of the game at all would mean even cracked copies can get updates and use the multiplayer servers. You don't see that as a benefit for pirate users?

WIlly: labelling someone as a pirate or pirate sympathiser because they're against DRM? That's pretty narrow-minded. I don't pirate, I pay for my software, but I'm completely against these DRM schemes such as appeared on BioShock, Spore, et al. You probably don't believe me, but I don't care. I have less than zero sympathy for pirates, since they're the reason I have to put up with seeing games I'd like to play be saddled with this bloody DRM* in the first place.

If they are against any DRM at all, of any type, yes. If you have an objection to specific DRM (securom, etc), that is entirely different. Disapproving of specific invasive side effects is not the same as painting it all with the same brush.

Yet another troll rant. Nothing new here. Ranting about DRM simply labels you as a pirate or pirate sympathizer to others. Reputation takes years to make, seconds to break. And yours was no different.

 

Bullshit.  He has an opinion and has a right to speak it.  Just because his opinion is different than yours, you label him a troll.  It must be an awesome responsibility to be the only one whos opinion counts.

I'm calling him a troll because he's complaining about something he clearly doesn't understand in a self-contradictory manner and expects to be taken seriously. Stardock has never had a complete "no DRM" stance, at least not while I've been buying their games. He specifically approves of how Sins was handled, even though GOO is essentially the same thing with a name put on it. Somehow the name makes it bad?

As for my opinion being the only one that matters, no - but it does matter to me. Just like your opinion of me will likely color how you receive my posts, my now-diminished opinion of him will affect how (and even if) I read his posts in the future.

on Apr 19, 2009

Just like your opinion of me will likely color how you receive my posts, my now-diminished opinion of him will affect how (and even if) I read his posts in the future.

True.

calling people trolls is real good defense. how bout you tell me why goo is bad? cause you cant play the game online when you illegally dl it?

I never said that GOO was bad.  I just said you were a coward, troll and a sheep.  It has nothing to do with the OP's opinion.

on Apr 19, 2009

Willy, Woca, did you even read all of my post. I said I wasn't trying to troll, and I'm not.

I dont understand why you like DRM. It's not a good thing. I just dont want Stardock to lose its anti DRM stance. I'm also worried about GOO being invasive and ineffective.

on Apr 19, 2009

Since when have they had to wait for the games?  It takes longer to download most of them than it does to crack them.  The cracked copies are usually the first thing available, they're almost always stripped of the protections before secondary release dates are met.  It's a minor delay if any, piracy doesn't gain anything by removing it.  The only people inconvenienced by anything are the customers.

 

There is no other justification needed for restricting server access to keys than simple property laws.  The server is physical property, controlled access to it has nothing to do with DRM.  Making sure the only way to play multiplayer is through their server, that is DRM.  Which, oddly enough, inconveniences customers.  Who'd a thunk...

 

I'm just fine putting up with minor annoyances for the sake of percieved wrongs.  I don't get excited over cd keys, having to leave the damn disk in the drive, I'll even put up with restricted multiplayer setups that don't allow direct connection.  None of it inconveniences people that don't even pay for the game, it's all positive for them, and the people circumventing the protections are having fun doing it.

on Apr 19, 2009

I love the "if you complain about DRM you're a pirate" argument, it so directly labels the person making it as a total moron. If I was a pirate, why would I care about DRM? It's not like pirates have to deal with it, after all, and it's not like there's been a DRM scheme yet that wasn't broken within days of the release of a game.

 

DRM only causes problems for paying customers, game pirates don't care about DRM one way or the other because they never have games that are saddled with it.

on Apr 19, 2009

One question, what the f'in forshizzlesticks does GOO stand for?

on Apr 19, 2009

GeneralEtrius
Willy, Woca, did you even read all of my post. I said I wasn't trying to troll, and I'm not.

I dont understand why you like DRM. It's not a good thing. I just dont want Stardock to lose its anti DRM stance. I'm also worried about GOO being invasive and ineffective.

did you read my post? did i ever call you a troll?

why don't you like drm? it's not a bad thing, it's not good, its needed

on Apr 19, 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AzpByR3MvI

Its really sad how bad the pirating was for Stardock\GPG in demigods case...

I paied money, and people who didnt get to dance with robbie rotten!

 

 

on Apr 19, 2009

Dude, that video has no connection to the discussion here.

And besides, piracy of Stardocks games isnt that bad.

on Apr 20, 2009

Vinraith
I love the "if you complain about DRM you're a pirate" argument, it so directly labels the person making it as a total moron. If I was a pirate, why would I care about DRM? It's not like pirates have to deal with it, after all, and it's not like there's been a DRM scheme yet that wasn't broken within days of the release of a game.

 

DRM only causes problems for paying customers, game pirates don't care about DRM one way or the other because they never have games that are saddled with it.

There's about a hundred thousand pirates that tried and failed to log onto the Demigod servers that probably cared about DRM. DRM is not just copy protection - the annoying shit like Starforce is, but even needing serial numbers and valid log-ins to use the servers are forms of DRM. Some people object to even that, and yes, I will call those people pirates. There is no other reason to want even trivial protections like serial numbers removed.

There is no other justification needed for restricting server access to keys than simple property laws.  The server is physical property, controlled access to it has nothing to do with DRM.

That would be an interesting debate, but one I'd rather not get into, seeing as I agree with you. Arguably, access to the server is sold with the game, so any restrictions could be seen as unreasonable. But that assumes the game is sold at all, which we know not to be the case (but of course people argue about that as well).

Willy, Woca, did you even read all of my post. I said I wasn't trying to troll, and I'm not.

I dont understand why you like DRM. It's not a good thing. I just dont want Stardock to lose its anti DRM stance. I'm also worried about GOO being invasive and ineffective.

Trying and being are two entirely different things. I know damn well most people see my posts in this topic as trolling, even though I'm not particularly trying to be a troll. Quite frankly, there is no way to express an opinion on a topic like this without someone else feeling trolled by it. It's the techie's equivalent to an abortion argument.

As to why I like DRM - I don't like most forms. Starforce is idiocy of the highest order, for much the reason psychoak stated. Lesser forms, such as serials, serve the purpose of preventing unauthorized copies from having the same full access to aftermarket updates and online features as legal copies. I see this as a "line in the sand"; giving way here, on any publisher's part, is simply an open invitation for leaches (how's that for a replacement term for pirate?) to insist others do the same.

Part of this is an optimist/pessimist split. I'm pessimistic enough to know that, given the choice, most people won't pay for something if a perfectly functional free copy is available. Look at public television in the US. What percent of the population support it financially, as opposed to the percent that watch it without supporting it? It's a donation not a requirement, and most people simply don't donate. That is the model I wish to avoid.

The backlash against piracy started about 10 years too late to actually do anything about curbing it. As can be seen in this topic and others, it's too far into the public consciousness that piracy isn't wrong. In the next 20 years or so, the people who grew up pirating without batting an eye will be outvoting those who didn't.

on Apr 20, 2009

WIllythemailboy
As to why I like DRM - I don't like most forms. Starforce is idiocy of the highest order, for much the reason psychoak stated. Lesser forms, such as serials, serve the purpose of preventing unauthorized copies from having the same full access to aftermarket updates and online features as legal copies. I see this as a "line in the sand"; giving way here, on any publisher's part, is simply an open invitation for leaches (how's that for a replacement term for pirate?) to insist others do the same.

I'd just like to point out that most people don't view CD-Keys or online-authorization to be DRM. The majority of people, when talking about how much they don't like DRM, are talking about software like Starforce. Publishers and developers understand this difference as well as, more often than not, they themselves don't view CD keys or online activations as DRM.

The problem with the word is that it's a general term. Very very few people had a problem with older DRM (cd-keys, and even online authorization). Many many more people have problems with this new breed of DRM. Obviously there is a problem with it.

on Apr 20, 2009

Man! When will people learn that SD has NEVER stated that they're anti-DRM?!

They're just anti-DDRM. Read: Just like the most of us they abhore SecuFuck, Shitforce and the likes and instead want to provide a means to protect IP with as little harrassment of the paying customers as possible...

And to those who sing along the tune of everyone disliking DDRM being a pirate: Go get a job at EA's PR division!

on Apr 20, 2009

Arguing about trolls is a waste of space, time and a possible good discussion.

3 Pages1 2 3